EPSTEIN
page 3 / 1412 . OCR, unverified
As APPTCEBIS LAW ese accommcnme aun ARR GM RN ARIE RRL ORIN RRR MLR 138
B. DISCUSSION ..........:ccccesecesssecesssecesssecesaeecusaeeeusaeessaeesssaeesusceesuneesueeeenneeeseeesseeessneessnresesneeess 141
VII. The Indictment Contains the Elements of Each Offense and Provides the Defendant
More Than Adequate Notice of the Charges Against Her .............cssscsssssssssscssseeeees 150
As APPTCEBIS LAW ese accommcnme aun ARR GM RN ARIE RRL ORIN RRR MLR 150
B. DISCUSSION ..........:ccccesecesssecesssecesssecesaeecusaeeeusaeessaeesssaeesusceesuneesueeeenneeeseeesseeessneessnresesneeess 152
VIII. There Is No Basis to Strike Any Portion of the Indictment ...............ccssscssssrcssseecesees 157
A. Relevant Facts ........cccccccssccessseceesseeesseeeesceeessneeeseneessneeessneecnsneeseseeeeseeeseseeesseeesseeessnreeesaees 158
Be APPLICABLE LAW vous accrmscemmer smmnamecomces acme cmc mE NMRERE He NEES NNO ea ATREOTNE OER ONAN 159
C. DiSCUSSION .......c.cccecccecescceeenececssececsuecessaecesauecusaaecusaaesssaeesusaeesnseeesnsneeesneesneeesseeessneeeesieeesaas 161
IX. The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Count One or Count Three as Multiplicitous Is
ec 169
Acs RGIGWOTE PAGS coe: ascscmonmes acre, cermeen GSI CR ARIE Me RRL AORN RRR TE MLR 169
B. Applicable Law... ccc ceecceecceesseceneceeeeeseeeeseecaeceaeeeseeesseecaecaeeeeneesaeecsaeeneeeseneesanessaeeeneeenee 170
C. DISCUSSION .........:ceecceeeeeeeeeceeeceseeeeneeseeecsaeeeaeeseeesaeecaaecaeeenessatessaecaeseenessneesaeessaeeeeneneneeeaeess 172
X. The Defendant’s Various Disclosure Motions Should be Denied .................sssessscssesees 174
As Hill af Particulars 18 NOt WarSHIGE cn onus cnme: oom eRe ENR RRNN a eRTERSR 174
1. Applicable Law... ee cece cececeseeeeeeeeeeceeeeeseeeeneesaeecsaecaeeeeneesaeecsaeeeaeeseneeeaeesnaeeeeeeseneeeaneed 174
2. DISCUSSION. ........:cceeceeeseeesceceeeeeseeeeneesaceceaecneeeseeesaeecsaeeaeeeeeeesaeecaeesneeseneesaeesnaeeeeeteneenaeers 178
B. The Defendant’s Requests for Early Production of a Witness List and Jencks Act Material
Should Be Denied ..........e cc eececeseceeeeeeeeeseeeceeceseenneesaeecseecaeeeseevseeesaeecaeeeeeseneesaeessaneneneeenes 182
Ly ACGPlSSBIS Laie cocommcsem sxmmeemeenn smaRENE eRRENRERLENON SRM sem eae: 182
2. DISCUSSION. ........:ceeeeeeeeeesceceneceeeeeneesaeecsaecsaeeeeneesaeecaeeaeeeseeesaeecaeeeaeeseneesaeesnaeeseeeeneeenners 184
C. The Defendant’s Additional Requests for Disclosure Should Be Denied... 185
XI. The Use of a Grand Jury Siting in White Plains Was Entirely Proper...................00 193
Acs ECR GPO rs soe ascecmcanmees scree eR GLARE IER CLR ARE MG RRL ORIN RRR ML 194
1. The SDNY and Local Rules for the Division of Business ..............eceeeeeereeeeeeeneeeeeeee 194
2. The SDNY Jury Plan oo... cee eecesececeeeceeeeeeeeesneeceaeeeeeseeeesaeecnaeeeeeseneesaeesnaeeeneeseneeeaeees 195
B. Applicable Law... ccc ceecceeccessseceneceeeeeseeesaeecsaeeeeeeeseeesaeecsaeenaeessneesaeecsaeeeeeseneesaeessaeenneesees 197
C. DISCUSSION .........::ceeceeeeesseeeeseceseeeeneesaeecsaeeeaeesneesaeecsaecnaeeseeeseeesaeecsaeeeseeesaeesaeestaeenneseneeeneees 198
1. The Defendant Was Properly Indicted by a Grand Jury Sitting in White Plains .......... 198
2. The Defendant’s Fair Cross-Section Claim Is Meritless .............cecceecceesceeeeeeeeeeeeeeennes 205
a. The Defendant Has Not Established that Blacks or Hispanics Are Unfairly
Represented .........ceceecceeececsneceneeeeneesneecseeceaeeeseeesaeecsaecaecesneesaeecaeecsaeeeseessneeseessaeeseneeaes 205
b. Any Potential Underrepresentation Is Not Due to Systematic Exclusion...............4. 210
CONCLUSION secs sascovsanecvavs ssmests cs sccann anousn ss srouanaanansws ss anesies sauusa se miewia canon aeaua aaa aE 212
ili
DOJ-OGR- 00002938
==================== END OF root__DOJ-OGR-00002938.jpg.txt ====================
==================== START OF root__DOJ-OGR-00002939.jpg.txt ====================
METADATA_SOURCE: .
METADATA_FILENAME: DOJ-OGR-00002939.jpg
----------------------------------------
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page5of 239
EXHIBIT LIST
Exhibit 1: Notes from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York
Exhibit 2: June 14, 2007 Email
Exhibit 3: November 2020 Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional
Responsibility
Exhibit 4: Notes from February 11, 2021 Call
Exhibit 5: Notes from February 29, 2016 Meeting
Exhibit 6: November 30, 2018 Email
Exhibit 7: December 6, 2018 Email
Exhibit 8: February 28, 2019 Government Letter to Judge Sweet
Exhibit 9: February 28, 2019 Government Letter to Judge Netburn
Exhibit 10: —_ Transcript of April 22, 2016 Deposition
Exhibit 11: Transcript of July 22, 2016 Deposition
Exhibit 12: Affidavit of Dr. Bernard R. Siskin
iv
DOJ-OGR- 00002939
==================== END OF root__DOJ-OGR-00002939.jpg.txt ====================
==================== START OF root__DOJ-OGR-00002940.jpg.txt ====================
METADATA_SOURCE: .